| The
following article appeared initially in the premiere issue of Wild Steelhead
and Atlantic Salmon Magazine, Spring 1994. Although almost a decade old, this
article still provides valuable insights into the plight of Vancouver Island Steelhead. PARADISE
LOST by Dr. Craig Orr |
| |
On an auspicious
January day, a 20-year-old English expatriate cast into British Columbia's Nimpkish
River, on the northeast coast of Vancouver Island, and hooked his first steelhead.
The year was 1928. The angler was Roderick L. Haig-Brown. The
thrill Haig-Brown experienced sharply contrasted with his family's disappointment
when Haig-Brown was dismissed from a prestigious English school of which his own
grandfather had once been headmaster. Sent to toil in America, Haig-Brown helped
cut down the virgin forests of the Pacific Northwest. When he had had enough,
and had decided to make his mark as a writer, he looked north to the Nimpkish
and the other still pristine rivers of Vancouver Island. He never looked back. |
| When
Roderick Haig-Brown died on the banks of the Campbell River in the autumn of 1976,
he left a legacy of some of the finest angling prose ever penned. He had also
elevated the steelhead to its deserved stature as one of the world's finest gamefish-the
equal, he persuaded, to the revered Atlantic salmon of his birthplace. Haig-Brown
was among the first to learn that the sea-going rainbow of his new Pacific home
would take flies-even dry flies. This, years before most anglers thought the fish
would look at anything but a deep-drifted cluster of salmon eggs. That
he discovered this on his own speaks volumes of the angler, and volumes also about
the remarkable resource he was fortunate to have experienced. The Vancouver Island
that the young, eager Haig-Brown explored with his split cane rods and soaked
gut leaders was a paradise. That our generation of steelhead anglers has been
robbed of such rich inheritance is painful and haunting. And the story behind
this diminished legacy must be told. Imagine
the fishing once enjoyed by Haig-Brown and other pioneer Vancouver Island anglers.
Imagine the paradise of clear-running rivers, more than 200 of them filled with
steelhead-steelhead that had never scraped a fin on the concrete of a hatchery.
Imagine, too, the brooding forests traversed by those rivers. Haig-Brown caught
his first steelhead barely into this century, before the Great Depression, decades
before modern fly lines were available, and the same year the first bridge was
built across Haig-Brown's beloved backyard Campbell River. Imagine
the scores of sea-run cutthroat trout that slashed at Haig-Brown's streamers,
Steelhead Bees and Bivisibles. He commonly took "10 to 12 nice cutthroat" in a
single day, incidental to steelhead, with many "up to four pounds." To
help prime the imagination-and indignation over what's been so rapidly squandered-it's
worth pondering some of the changes that have occurred to Roderick Haig-Brown's
Vancouver Island in the scant 60 years since he and his wife Ann purchased 20
acres on the banks of the Campbell River in 1934. top
|
| |
Of
Fish and Forests Rainforests
gained a toehold on Vancouver Island nearly 12,000 years ago. As the last glacier
retreated northward, cedars, hemlocks, firs and spruces began liberating soil
and nutrients from the rocks, while taming the wild rivers. Lush conifer crowns
and extensive roots damped the kinetic energy of persistent winter rains, helping
to control runoff. Trees also bolstered summer river flows, and provided shade
to help cool and oxygenate water. |
|
Salmon and steelhead
soon swarmed in 90 stable and diverse watersheds, each larger than 12,000 acres.
For 10,000 years those fish adapted to the conditions specific to their own natal
rivers. Some 25 to 30 Island rivers, most with natural obstructions such as bedrock
chutes and falls, had "summer" steelhead, that is, runs that entered freshwater
from April through October but which did not spawn until the following spring.
Those and more than 150 other rivers also sported winter- and spring-spawning
steelhead, the exact timing of each migration fine-tuned over centuries by flow
regimes and other environmental and physical factors. A
true cornucopia of natural richness greeted Haig-Brown. More than 200 rivers with
steelhead! Far more than any angler could experience in a blessed lifetime. A
flowing tapestry of 200 rivers, each home to a race of sea-run rainbow genetically
unique from all others, a distinctness borne from the diversity of the ancient
forests and watersheds. Yet it was and is a fragile diversity. Many of the rivers,
cold and nutrient poor, support only small populations of steelhead. The largest
stocks of summer steelhead number 1,000 to 1,400 fish. Most rivers sustain fewer
than 500. Many support fewer than 100-half the 200 figure the American Fisheries
Society identifies as the "threshold of extinction" for any given population of
salmon. Perhaps 7,000 summer fish exist in total, and four times that many winter
fish. The rarest of the Pacific salmonids, millennia in the making, thinly spread
over 200 streams and rivers. top
|
 |
Clearcutting
the Ancient Rainforests "It
would be logical to suppose that the community would reflect its own longterm
interest by a vital involvement in the forests and their conservation. Unhappily,
it does not. The forests have already been stripped of the best wood and replanting
has not kept up with cutting. The community stumbles on, on the mistaken hunch
that somehow progress will make the irreversible destruction worthwhile by eventually
replacing it with something else." (Haig-Brown, Measure
of the Year, 1950) |
|
Vancouver Island
forests and fish began getting into trouble about the time that Man had all but
exterminated sea otters in the 1880s. Trees then became the coveted resource,
although logging stayed small scale and coastal until the turn of the century,
when locomotives and the "steam donkey" extended the logger's reach inland from
tidewater. Between 1903 and 1907, 15,000 timber licenses were granted, covering
nine million acres of the Island. By 1917, 98 locomotives and 354 flatcars snaked
along 62 logging railways. The boom was blooming, and the first casualties were
the centuries-old conifers of the lush and accessible valley bottoms. No forestry
guideline or fishery officer protected Island rivers. Trees were yarded across
rivers. Riverbanks were stripped bare. Log jams plugged rivers. Floods scoured
spawning beds. When
the valley bottom timber dwindled, matters got worse. Clearcuts and logging roads
sprouted on the steep slopes. Typically, prescient, Haig-Brown wrote in The Western
Angler that "the logging methods at present in use (1939) seriously threaten the
future of Vancouver Island streams. The practice of clear logging leaves the banks
of the streams without cover, and at the same time causes a rapid run-off of the
rainfall, with resulting extremes of high and low water." Studies
on Vancouver Island's damaged Oyster River clearly show that denuded and scarred
headwater slopes cannot control runoff from persistent Pacific Northwest rains.
Resulting winter floods flush sand and silt into rivers, often cementing or washing
away spawning gravel, and reducing growth and vitality of salmon fry and parr
(see the sidebar Logging's Deadly Synergism on page 13). Protests
by Haig-Brown and others against poor logging practices failed to sway provincial
governments seemingly hell bent on liquidating Vancouver Island timber. Only six
of the 90 watersheds on Vancouver Island of more than 5,000 hectares (12,355 acres)
remain unlogged. Three of those last six, draining into Clayquot Sound on Vancouver
Island's southwest coast, were recently opened to logging. An
overdue forest audit in 1992 found that 34 of 53 Vancouver Island streams examined
had been significantly damaged by shoddy logging practices. Damage was deemed
moderate or major in every cut block inspected (an inspection that excluded about
three quarters of the Island's steelhead-bearing streams). Debris torrents, slides
and massive loads of silt were blamed on inadequate cleanup, clearcutting of steep
slopes, logging too close to streams, and poor ditch and road maintenance. The
littany of damage included "complete habitat loss" on portions of 11 rivers, a
tributary of the Canton River "paved with gravel," and a "buried" side channel
of the Nahwitti River (itself logged to its banks). British
Columbia Provincial Minister of Forests Dan Miller, formerly a mill worker, was
"absolutely appalled" by the audit, and ordered guilty logging companies to "repair"
damaged streams. No mention-let alone, accounting-was made of the true costs of
that damage to fish. Nor could glossy cleanup reports alter the meagerness or
futility of most repairs. Despite
another black eye for an industry trying to shed a "Brazil of the North" label,
Miller was politely lukewarm to proposals by the Steelhead Society of British
Columbia to widen streamside management zones (from 15 to 90 meters), establish
forestry guidelines on private lands, and end the grapple-yard logging methods
that chew up hillsides and accelerate erosion. Despite
obvious and catastrophic damage, Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans-the
federal agency charged with protecting fish habitat-chose not to prosecute a single
logging company cited in the audit. This even though Sierra Legal Defense Fund
Chief Counsel Greg McDade calls the federal Fisheries Act "one of the most powerful
laws in Canada." Meantime,
Vancouver Island provincial fisheries biologist Craig Wightman, whose Nanaimo
office commissioned the forest audit, says he is "just now seeing the effects
of high-level logging on many Vancouver Island streams." Wightman cites "infilling"
of riverbeds and instability of stream channels as the "big problems." top
|
 |
Of
Mines and Dams "I
am afraid for the wonderland of Strathcona Park because its fate lies with a Cabinet
(government) of dreary old men who have lost their capacity for wonder, if indeed
they ever had any. (Roderick Haig-Brown, Vancouver Province
Newspaper, 1952) Even
though Vancouver Island rivers and fish have long suffered from the synergistic
effects of poor logging practices, the coup de grace for the Campbell's
wild fish was a mix of dams, overfishing, urban sprawl-with a toxic chaser of
heavy metal. |
| Logger
and entrepreneur Mike King first recognized the power potential of the Campbell
River when he acquired the hydro rights in 1909. In 1926, nine years before Haig-Brown
bought Herb Pidcock's property on the Campbell, British Columbia Premier Duff
Patullo offered the waters of Campbell River to any company "ready to harness
and use them." Hydroelectric
development of the Campbell River watershed began in earnest when the British
Columbia Power Commission was formed in 1945, and work started on the design and
construction of John Hart Dam, approximately five miles upstream of the mouth
of the Campbell River. A second storage dam at Ladore Falls subsequently flooded
Lower Campbell Lake, swallowing nearby, fish-rich McIvor and Loveland lakes. When
plans to dam Buttle Lake were announced in 1952, the public protested. Most of
Buttle Lake was with-in Strathcona Park. Its flooding would inundate shoreline
shallows and trout spawning areas. Haig-Brown
led the protest, recalls daughter Valerie Haig-Brown from her Alberta home. "I
remember being allowed to skip school to attend the public hearings with my father,"
she said. "It was 1952. You have to remember that public hearings on government
projects were rare back then." Rarely
successful, either. Island pulp mills in Victoria, Port Alberni, and Nanaimo wanted
power, and construction of the Strathcona Dam began the following year. Damage
continued in 1956 and 1957 when parts of the Heber, Salmon and Quinsam rivers
were diverted to supplement Campbell River runoff. The final blow to Haig-Brown's
beloved cutthroat, steelhead salmon was delivered by the opening of a mine at
Buttle Lake in the early 1960's. top |
| 
|
The
Man and His Fish
"The true sea-run cutthroat is a very special fish and makes very special fishing.
My own opinion is that, at his best, he is in every way comparable (to steelhead);
and under some circumstances a discerning angler may even find him superior."
(Haig-Brown, A River Never Sleeps, 1946) |
| To
comprehend the damage to Campbell River's Wild fish, it is helpful to appreciate
what those fish meant to Haig-Brown. Steelhead
clearly held a large spot in Haig-Brown's heart. In A River Never Sleeps
he says, "In May I turn to a smaller rod and go to the Island pools to find our
own run of summer fish, little fish seldom over five pounds, seldom under two,
but sea-run steelhead just the same and brave fish that hit the fly hard and jump
freely in the broken water." Haig-Brown
pursued steelhead year-around. Yet a case can be made that it was the sea-run
cutthroat that kept him happily wading the Campbell River. Haig-Brown
noted in The Western Angler (1939) a "strong movement (of cutthroat) to
fresh water in August," with "a fair number of fish" reaching four pounds. "In
March and April and on into May the cutthroats are there (Campbell River) because
the salmon fry are coming up from the gravel and moving down; the fishing is often
quick and fierce, with a big wet fly quickly cast to a slashing rise and worked
back fast" (A River Never Sleeps). One July he "floated a Mackenzie River
bucktail down the runs (of the Island Pool), dancing it back to me from wave top
to wave top on the upstream wind," noting, "It seldom finished the ride. Big cutthroats,
three-pounders, some of them nearly four pounds, came at it like fiercer creatures
than any fish." Haig-Brown
also spent years stalking cutthroat in the estuary of the Campbell River, "getting
very fine results on the last two hours of the ebb (tide)." Once, after fooling
three cutthroat of three pounds each-in less than 10 minutes-he and his partner
retired their Bivisibles because that pattern seemed "too deadly" (A River
Never Sleeps). Cutthroat
clearly provided Haig-Brown with diverse, quality angling. Yet, even while he
enjoyed the fine fishing, he noted that "cutthroat runs of British Columbia streams
are not even nearly so good as they were at one time." He cited as example one
afternoon in 1911 when "two rods-not wonderfully good rods, either-took from Big
Qualicum River 125 fish" (The Western Angler). Haig-Brown
blamed these declines on a "bag limit of fifteen fish per day," a minimum "size
limit of eight inches (that) is too low; and the drain of year-round fishing in
tidal waters." Van Egan, a now retired biology teacher and Haig-Brown's long-time
fishing partner, also recalls a dramatic decline in Campbell River cutthroat,
after salmon roe was again legalized in the mid-1950s. Egan,
past Chairman of the Campbell River Environmental Council and author of Tyee
(1988), a history of Campbell River's famous chinook fisher, also suspects a more
insidious agent in the demise of the Campbell's wild sea-run cutthroat: heavy
metal pollution from the Buttle Lake mine. Egan
remembers seeing so many cutthroat in the upper estuary of the Campbell, "they
were slashing from one bank to another. All of a sudden, in one year in the mid-seventies,
they were gone." When
federal fisheries biologists published A Review of the Potential Influence
of Heavy Metals on Salmonid Fishes in The Campbell River, Vancouver Island, B.C.
in 1982, they noted a "consistent rise in zinc levels from .007 mg/L in 1971 to
about 0.048 mg/L at the end of 1980," and recommended "immediate reduction of
zinc and copper concentrations in the Campbell." "Haig-Brown
warned about such problems (heavy-metal Pollution) when he fought against the
Buttle Lake mine," recalls Egan. Fisheries
biologist Wightman suggests that "other factors also may have contributed to the
decline of cutthroat, including urbanization of tributary streams and competition
with larger, hatchery-reared coho salmon." At
the same time that cutthroat vanished, says Egan, "wild steelhead were crashing."
He painfully recalls "four years in the mid to late seventies when counts of steelhead
went from 30 to 13 to nine and, finally, one fish. The true Campbell River winter-run
steelhead is extinct." Chinook
declines paralleled those of steelhead. Barely 1,000 spawners returned to the
Campbell River by 1980, 3,000 fewer than the previous 10-year average. Egan
again suspects heavy metals contributed to those declines, but he is also critical
of hydro development: "The dams cut off spawning arears and prevented the recruitment
of spawning gravel." Nor
were other rivers spared the Campbell's problems. Toxins leaching from an defunct
copper mine exterminated steelhead in the nearby Tsolum River. A gene pool thousands
of years in the making, wiped out in 20. (Though a mine executive cites the presence
of stray pink salmon as a "sign of recovery.") One river south, a different problem
yields the same result. The damned Puntledge River had two wild summer steelhead
return in 1991 - both were male. On the southwest Island, summer steelhead dwindled
below extinction thresholds in dozens of Barkley Sound rivers, first logged, then
barricaded by hundreds of gillnets set for enhanced sockeye salmon. Whole sections
of the San Juan River clogged with silt from unregulated logging on private land.
Similar stories emerged from the Nitinat and Caycuse. The Gordon River, A Class
One steelhead river, not included in the forest audit, even rated a visit in 1992
by the deputy-minister of forests, after its banks were stripped and its gravel
bed used as a logging road. This, while governments and forest companies tout
the end of the "bad old days" of logging. While
not exonerating dams, logging or pollution, biologist Wightman also points out
that there was an Island-wide crash of steelhead in the late 1970s, likely related
to "poor marine survival, poaching and general overfishing. Remember, bag limits
back then were 40 steelhead a year." Further
confounding the issue and contributing to the decline of salmonids was the massive
increase in the catching power of the Johnstone Strait commercial seine net fleet.
Boats operating in the narrow Georgia Strait approach waters north of Campbell
River took huge quantities of chinook and coho salmon. Provincial Ministry of
Environment biologists estimated that the non-selective nets also incidentally
killed some 4,000 to 5,000 summer steelhead as recently as 1978. Since
1975, most Campbell River steelhead and chinook have been hatched and reared in
plastic trays and concrete swimways. Some 20,000 winter-run steelhead smolts,
offspring of Quinsam River parents, are released each year into the watershed.
A further 25,000 juvenile summer-runs are borrowed from the more northerly, and
as yet, less damaged, Tsitka River. The hatchery has also raised chinook runs
to about 5,000, but the fact remains, when Haig-Brown died in 1976 on the banks
of the river he loved, there was a second, unwritten epitaph for wild cutthroat,
chinook and steelhead. top
|
 |
On
Estuaries
"I knew little or nothing of tides and even less of the fearful things men do
to river mouths in the process of civilization." (Haig-Brown,
Fisherman's Fall, 1964) |
|
If the 20th century
devoured Vancouver Island trees, it pecked piranha-like at the coastal estuaries
that nurtured Haig-Brown's beloved cutthroat and juvenile salmon. The
first bites added up to 32 percent of the marsh habitat on the east coast of Vancouver
Island-by the turn of the century-when early settlers diked upper marshes for
farming. Agriculture was present at the Campbell River estuary in 1938, disappeared
by 1965, and was followed by a log dump and log dry-sorting site (1938), dredging
and sawmill expansion (1958), marinas (1975) and log storage sites (1981). "Since
I moved to Campbell River in 1956," says Egan, "I've noticed the coastline gradually
filling in, straightening out. Just recently, the Discovery Harbour Marina ate
up another 441/2 acres." Happily,
Egan also witnessed a marsh development program and dryland log storage in the
1980s, which partly countered estuary loss. Egan also helped the Steelhead Society
of British Columbia's Campbell River Branch, the municipality, and the Department
of Fisheries in an $80,000 project to rebuild the Willow Creek estuary, to the
south. top
|
 |
Paradise
Regained?
"Conservation is fair and honest dealing with the future, usually at some cost
to the immediate present." (Haig-Brown, Measure of the
Year,1950) "The
last ten years or so have established the point that hatcheries can produce steelhead
trout. Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing remains highly debatable. What
is clear is that there has been an orgy of hatchery production, especially in
the State of Washington, at a time when nobody had a very good idea of what the
results might be." (Haig-Brown, The Fly Fisher Magazine,
1975) |
| The
Habitat, production and diversity of Vancouver Island Salmon and steelhead have
been subordinated to Homosapiens' insatiable appetite for resources, mainly,
trees. Recent tightening of fisher-forestry guidelines (1987), and cuts in still
unsustainable harvest rates, may reduce rates of damage, yet the costs of past
logging remain high-and unpaid in full. Biologist Wightman's warning that we are
"only now seeing the effects of high-level logging on steelhead" is sobering-such
effects are likely to persist for decades. Moreover,
the past and pat response to the damage caused by logging, dams, over-fishing,
and pollution-besides ignoring the problem-has been to erect hatcheries to "supplement"
wild fish. The federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans-the same agency that
declined to prosecute a single forest company for logging damage-has spent $500
million on West Coast salmon enhancement prog4rams in the past 15 years. A
large part of that half-billion dollars has gone into capital costs of hatcheries.
Many of those hatcheries produce coho salmon, in theory, to "restore" wild coho
in Georgia Straight waters (eastern Vancouver Island), whose population have been
sliced in half in the last 15 years. In reality, those hatcheries mask declines
of wild coho while diverting habitat restoration funds. More hatchery coho also
means more coho fishermen (sport and commercial), placing further strain on remaining
wild stocks (indistinguishable from hatchery-rear brethren). Fortunately,
as more and more people grasp the immense value of wild fish, the orgy of "concrete
palaces" seems to be abating. Fortunately, too, the steelhead that inhabit the
200 plus rivers on Vancouver Island remain the most diverse and wild of their
kind (in contrast to steelhead populations in nearby Washington State rivers,
homogenized and tamed by 50 years of hatchery programs). Nearly 90 percent of
the estimated 260,000 adult steelhead of British Columbia are of wild or natural
origin, a percentage which could increase, given the strong focus on wild stock
management by provincial fisheries biologists (including Island-wide catch-and-release
regulations for all wild steelhead). Those
biologists, and groups such as the Steelhead Society, continue to champion numerous
programs which enhance survival and productivity of wild steelhead, cutthroat,
and salmon: stream fertilization projects, a $5 million smolt deflector at hydro
generators on the Puntledge River, and many habitat research, protection and restoration
initiatives. Sea-run cutthroat have even returned to rebuilt Willow Creek estuary.
The Steelhead Society is also advocating selective commercial fisheries, to reduce
critically high by-catches of wild coho and steelhead. So far, only some aboriginal
fishermen have adopted traditional, selective harvesting methods, including beach
seines and in-river traps. Still,
no true island exists in today's world. The fate of Vancouver Island steelhead-an
indicator species of the health and vigor of watersheds-is tied to how other steelhead
rivers fare in comparison. Vancouver Island already serves as an "escape valve"
for non-resident anglers seeking quality angling. Their numbers, skyrocketing
in step with unprecedented and unchecked population growth of the Pacific Northwest
(the province's population increases by 5,000 additional people each month), jeopardizes
the very experience they seek. More
humans also means more burden on a resource already imperiled by greed, pollution,
ignorance, political indifference and public apathy. The strain of more humans,
and the transient nature of society, further weakens the "community" Haig-Brown
felt was necessary to protect local environments-and thus the wild steelhead of
his beloved Vancouver Island paradise. top |
| |
In
The Spirit of Haig-Brown
"I have known very few rivers thoroughly and intimately. The Campbell I know almost
as a man should know a river. I have a fair idea of what to expect from the river,
and usually, because I fish it that way, the river gives me approximately what
I expect of it." (Haig-Brown, A River Never Sleeps, 1946)
|
| Roderick
Haig-Brown's piece of paradise was a two-mile stretch of flowing river. And the
Campbell River's-large and diverse runs of wild cutthroat, chinook and steelhead
ensured quality fishing, each and every month. The Campbell of 1946 was little
fished and unaffected by logging, hydro-electric development, heavy metal pollution,
or hatcheries. Those
and other current-day problems have since spawned a more nomadic breed of steelhead
angler. Randy Killoran, a resident of Campbell River for all his 24 years, is
one example. Sedentary salmon guide by summer, the spirited Killoran transforms
into a self-proclaimed steelheading fanatic in winter. Armed with his trusty Volkswagen
van and a well-thumbed copy of Jim Harrison's The Theory & Practice of Rivers,
we fished together this past spring at Killoran's current favorite river,
the Gold. "This
is my first full year on the Gold," he told me, defining "full" somewhere in the
enviable vicinity of 100 fishing days. "I
started out on the Campbell River when I was 15 or 16. Since then I've been on
a sort of two-year migration." Killoran
left the Campbell River after two years because he "wasn't enjoying the water.
Hydro changed the riverbed with seriously high flows," and kept the river "too
high and fast" for his liking. For
the next two years, Killoran fished the Quinsam River, a tributary of the Campbell.
He left the Quinsam after crowds seeking hatchery-produced steelhead multiplied
"to the nth degree." Killoran's
next two-year stop was the Muchalat River, a tributary of the Gold. In his first
year there, the Muchalat suffered a flood from headwaters logging that "rearranged"
its lower reaches. In his second year, the Muchalat went "dead"-sending him back
to the east side of the Island and the Salmon River. He stopped fishing the Salmon
in year two because of the big flood. "I
rafted down the Salmon just after Christmas to see what the river looked like.
I got a queer sensation about where I was, and then I realized that I was in a
rapids that had been one of the nicest pools in the river, called Big Tree Creek
Pool. The pool had been there for a couple of centuries, right? Now there were
big trees and stumps everywhere. It was a horror show. I was so appalled I started
fishing the Eve River [farther northwest]." Yet
the Eve soon started "filling in with gravel. It's been hacked." He added, with
angry resignation, "If there's ever a river on Vancouver Island that's been butchered
by logging, it's the Eve." Now,
two years later, before he's even a quarter century old, the immediate-past Chairman
of the Campbell River Branch of the Steelhead Society has just finished year one
on his sixth "home" river. Will his two-year cycle be broken? "I
don't know," Killoran admits tentatively, "the Gold is getting pretty crowded."
Much of that crowd is from south of the Canadian border. They tell of the destruction
of rivers in the United States by poor logging practices, dams, and an overdependence
on hatchery-reared steelhead. Those Americans are on migrations of their own,
in search of quality angling. Killoran's
travels raise troubling questions. Was Haig-Brown the last of a breed? How many
sedentary and satisfied stream anglers remain on Vancouver Island? With
the destructive effects of indifferent logging on stream stability and fish populations
predicted to persist 80 or more years, are modern steelheaders like Killoran doomed
to wander a damaged wilderness for twice the penance doled out to Moses? And what
will the future call us for having tolerated so much ravaging of rivers? |